Friday, August 3, 2012
Thursday, August 2, 2012
Ignosticism-igtheism
We ignostics find God to be an incoherent and contradictory concept: as noted by Carneades, the first ignostic, the Epicureans and the Stoics apply the concept God so indiscriminately that He is incoherent.
Therefore, He means no more than does a square circle or married bachelor! As Aquinas' superfluity argument argues, God adds nothing to explanations. Too bad, he tried to overcome it and the presumption of naturalism with his five failed ways-suggestions.
God adds no more than demons and gremlins as any primary cause and explanation.
Theists resort to the arguments from personal incredulity and from ignorance; why is there anything than nothing as Leibniz queries means he could not envision that it was eternal, needing no explanation whatsoever and answering with the ignorance known as God- that empty word-space!Therefore, he posed a pseudo-question with a pseudo-answer as God did it is so unimformative! Theists must illustrate how He works in the Cosmos instead of merely assuming so: they stretch that Supreme Mystery,abetted by still more mysteries, as the Sufficient Reason and Ultimate Explanation with incoherency!
Prof. Irwin Corey's has better double-talk!
Any demurrals or additions?http://ignosticmorgansblog.wordpress.com
Therefore, He means no more than does a square circle or married bachelor! As Aquinas' superfluity argument argues, God adds nothing to explanations. Too bad, he tried to overcome it and the presumption of naturalism with his five failed ways-suggestions.
God adds no more than demons and gremlins as any primary cause and explanation.
Theists resort to the arguments from personal incredulity and from ignorance; why is there anything than nothing as Leibniz queries means he could not envision that it was eternal, needing no explanation whatsoever and answering with the ignorance known as God- that empty word-space!Therefore, he posed a pseudo-question with a pseudo-answer as God did it is so unimformative! Theists must illustrate how He works in the Cosmos instead of merely assuming so: they stretch that Supreme Mystery,abetted by still more mysteries, as the Sufficient Reason and Ultimate Explanation with incoherency!
Prof. Irwin Corey's has better double-talk!
Any demurrals or additions?http://ignosticmorgansblog.wordpress.com
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)